![]() Many private users therefore not infrequently reach for the inexpensive XG85, but we can’t really recommend it even for their own living room. Therefore, they are not without reason very popular with SMEs, but unfortunately a bit too expensive for home use. □ No, but seriously: Even if we are sometimes somewhat critical of Sophos and are not super satisfied with everything, Sophos firewalls are among the best on the market. But what else can we say about it, after all, we deal with it every day. The Sophos firewalls are already a great thing. In this post, we’ll give a brief overview of which Sophos products are worth considering for the home and can be used for free. Since virtually anyone can buy Sophos from us, home users are also frequent guests in our online store.Īlthough Sophos is primarily active in the business environment, it also offers enough functions for private households, some of which can even be used free of charge. They range from small two-man operations, to large companies with multiple locations worldwide. The Electoral Commission has worked with the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and external experts to investigate the incident and had since made improvements to the security of its IT systems, it said.Our business model of making Sophos products available online to everyone means we get a wide variety of requests every day. However, anyone who has been in contact with the Commission, or who was registered to vote between 20, should remain vigilant for unauthorised use or release of their personal data. They have said that no immediate action needs to be taken in response to this notification. Information related to donations and/or loans to registered political parties and non-party campaigners is held in a system not affected by this incident. The personal data held on the Commission’s email servers is also unlikely to present a high risk to individuals unless someone has sent them sensitive or personal information in the body of an email, as an attachment or via a form on its website, such information may include medical conditions, gender, sexuality, or personal financial details. The attack has not had an impact on the electoral process, has not affected the rights or access to the democratic process of any individual, nor has it affected anyone’s electoral registration status. It is possible however that this data could be combined with other data in the public domain, such as that which individuals choose to share themselves, to infer patterns of behaviour or to identify and profile individuals. The data contained in the registers is limited, and much of it is already in the public domain.Īccording to the risk assessment used by the Information Commissioner’s Office to assess the harm of data breeches, the personal data held on the electoral registers – typically name and address – does not in itself present a high risk to individuals. The electoral register data held by the Commission has not been amended or changed in anyway as a result of the attack and remains in the form in which they received it. They are used for research purposes and to enable permissibility checks on political donations. The Commission holds copies of the electoral registers to enable its statutory functions. Address of overseas electors registered outside of the UK.Date on which a person achieves voting age that year.Įlectoral Register data not held by the Commission:.Personal data contained in Electoral Register entries:.Any personal images sent to the Commission.Content of the webform and email that may contain personal data.Contact telephone number (personal and/or business).Home address if included in a webform or email.Email addresses (personal and/or business).Personal data contained in email system of the Commission:.The Commission’s email system was also accessible during the attack. ![]() The registers did not include the details of those registered anonymously. The registers held at the time of the cyber-attack include the name and address of anyone in the UK who registered to vote between 20, as well as the names of those registered as overseas voters. They were able to access reference copies of the electoral registers, held by the Commission for research purposes and to enable permissibility checks on political donations. During the cyber-attack, the perpetrators had access to the Commission’s servers which held their email, control systems, and copies of the electoral registers. It became clear that hostile actors had first accessed the systems in August 2021. The UK Electoral Commission has said that this incident was identified in October 2022 after suspicious activity was detected on their systems. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |